 |
FAQs
Jobs
Downloads
About the
Center
Support
the Center
Outreach: Conferences,
Seminars, Etc
Calendar
Contact Us
Resources Home
CTD Home
|
 |
Legal Issues in Gifted
Genius Denied How to Stop Wasting our Brightest Young Minds. Jan &
Bob Davidson. Simon & Schuster, 2004.
Written by the founders of the Davidson Institute for Talent Development,
this book sheds light on the failure of our nation's public schools to
adequately educate gifted students. Genius Denied makes the compelling
argument that while school districts are required to leave no child
behind, the needs of our most talented students are being overlooked.
According to this book, most of the 29 states with funding for gifted
programs are not specialized to address and develop the academic needs
of highly gifted children. Also, in the midst of major federal and state
initiatives to provide funding for low performing schools and children
with disabilities, virtually no new funding is available for gifted and
talented programming. The authors argue that the quest for equity in schools
should aim to provide all children with an education appropriate
to their abilities - one that challenges them and helps them grow.
Genius Denied describes this quiet crisis in education with
colorful examples and well -supported statistics, but it does not leave
the reader hopeless. The book provides parents and educators with suggestions
for how to overcome these inadequacies in the current educational system.
The Davidsons use real life scenarios to teach parents about becoming
their child's advocate, seeking out supplemental educational services,
and finding mentors for their children. They discuss ways in which teachers,
mentors and parents can work together to create more challenging academic
programs in schools.
The Davidsons argue that continued failure to address the needs of the
nation's brightest students means a loss of potential in a country that
depends on talented people to continue its forward progress. This book
provides an eloquent illustration on this national problem complete with
an inspiring set of action steps that can ultimately lead to a solution.
Gifted Children and Legal Issues. An Update. Frances A. Karnes and
Ronald G. Marquardt. Gifted Psychology Press. 2000.
This is meant to be an update to the 1991 volume. It has several new chapters
including one on the role of the Office of Civil Rights in legal issues
surrounding gifted children and a brief chapter on negotiation.
Gifted Children and Legal Issues in Education. Parent's Stories of
Hope. By Frances A. Karnes and Ronald G. Marquardt. Ohio Psychology Press.
1991.
This is really a companion piece to the book above and is riveting reading
for anyone interested in the field. Karnes and Marquardt collected 13
case studies of various legal cases involving gifted children, school
policies, etc. The stories were written by the parents themselves and
detail their struggles with obtaining appropriate instruction and programs
for their children, obtaining admissions to schools or in some cases,
early admissions, and in obtaining credit for courses done outside of
school or earlier than typical.
Gifted Children and the Law. Mediation, Due Process and Court Cases. By
Frances A. Karnes and Ronald G. Marquardt. Ohio Psychology Press, 1991.
This book was meant for many audiences--parents embroiled in battles with
local schools who may be seeking legal action, school districts who need
to be better informed about legal issues surrounding gifted children,
and lawyers who may be representing children and families. The book has
chapters devoted to the current status of state and federal statues pertaining
to gifted children, the process involved in taking legal action on behalf
of a gifted child, a review of cases involving gifted children and their
education, and other kinds of legal issues that may involve consideration
of giftedness, e.g., custody. Several chapters are devoted to describing
due process and mediation. The last chapter is very interesting and addresses
potential future issues in gifted education which may end up in the courts
such as whether state law may limit the age at which a student can enter
a post-secondary institution.
|
 |